Tuesday, December 10, 2019

International and Comparative Employment Relations

Question: Discuss about the International and Comparative Employment Relations. Answer: Introduction: The main focus of this paper is to present a comprehensive discussion on the Fair Work Commission (FWC) with regards to agreements making and approval. Understanding the role FWC play in making as well as approving agreements is very essential to enchanting employee relations. The Vice-President Graeme Watson of the FWC has resigned and this has poked holes on the effectiveness of the Australias workplace relations legislations as well as the manner in which it is being administered by national tribunal. The resignation attracted substantial national media attention when it came in January 2017. The President sent a letter to the Employment Minister, Michaelia Cash with content that drew lots of public interest. The letter paints FWC as partisan, dysfunctional as well as divided and hence there is a need to analyze and understand the above question relating to the role of FWC. The dissenting views of the President concluded his dissatisfaction that family alongside domestic violence leave that ACTU claim is essential to offer a fair along with relevant safety net of conditions along with terms and backed the rejection of ACTUs claims. The reason for dissenting is that allowing ACTU would introduce a kind of leave possible of being taken before prior approval. Such an approach in Watsons view to the problem of domestic violence avails the risk of disheartenment degree of trust at workstation along with causing substantial indecision alongside cost for workers. The rejection has been welcomed by Australian Industry Group terming the reasoning as solid and convincing. This was mainly because employers show diversity in capacities to offer support to workers victimized by domestic violence in personal lives. There were views against the claim by the union to vary the awards to allow every worker an entitlement to ten days paid leave annually. The Enterprise Bargaining on the Brink details the enterprise bargaining process. This is the process negotiation often between employers, employees as well as their bargaining representatives with sole aim or goal of making the enterprise agreement. It has been provided for in the Australias new workplace relation system that came to force in July 1, 2009 following its establishment by the Fair Work Act 2009 (FWA 2009) governing Australian workplaces. The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) primarily assist workers, employers, contractors as well as the community in understanding as well as complying with this new system (Fair Work Commission 2015). FWO 2009 offers education, information along with advice besides helping in resolving workplace complaints, conducting investigations as well as enforcing appropriate Commonwealth workplace laws. The FWO 2009 creates a set of precise rules as well as obligations relating to how such process is to take place, incorporating rules relating to bargaining, content of enterprise agreements, as well as how such agreements are made and subsequently approved. Various enterprise agreements exist including single-enterprise agreement, Greenfield agreement and multi-enterprise agreement. The shared and separate workplace agreements exist within preceding system of workplace relations were substituted on July 1, 2009 by a solitary kind of arrangement called the enterprise agreement. It is the arrangement amid single or additional nationwide system employees along with employers as outlined in arrangement. These covenants are negotiated by stakeholders via shared bargaining based on good faith, essentially at level of enterprise. With the FWA 2009, the enterprise implies any form of commerce, project, action and task. FWC is mandated to make agreements. These agreement can be single, multi- and Greenfield. A single-enterprise type is arrived at amid a solitary proprietor (and 2 or more solitary interest companies) besides the staffs hired at time agreements is reached, in addition to those that shall be enclosed under this arrangement. The solitary interest companies are those in a shared project or shared enterprise and are associated companies. They as well can be those companies sanctioned as solitary interest by FWC that could either be franchisees or additional proprietors whereby the Employment Minister has undertaken pronouncement. Multi enterprise agreement is arrived at amid 2 or additional companies (who are never altogether singe interest proprietors) alongside workers hired at period contract is reached alongside that shall be shielded under the contract. Greenfield arrangement is made with respect to a novel enterprise of employer (s) beforehand given employees are hired. It can be whichever a solitary enterprise arrangement or the multi enterprise arrangement. The participants to the Greenfield arrangement are those employer (s) in the multi-enterprise Greenfield contract alongside one or additional appropriate worker association. The process of making the enterprise agreement can as well be presented. The FWA 2009 offers a simple, flexible as well as fair framework which helps employees and employers to bargain on the basis of good faith to reach the enterprise contract. Employees, proprietors and corresponding haggling reps are engaged in this course of negotiating for a given planned enterprise arrangement. The proprietor has to give notification to their workers of the right for representation by the bargaining representatives in the course of bargaining of the enterprise agreement with an exemption of the greenfield agreements as early as conceivable, and never beyond fourteen days following the notice period for an arrangement (often beginning of haggling). The notice needs to be availed to every present worker who shall be protected by the enterprise arrangement. The company who makes the Greenfield agreement has to provide a written notification to every worker organization which is a bartering agents for given proposed arrangement. Such a notification has to entail the beginning date of the 6 month negotiation duration for the Greenfield agreement. The approval of the agreements is a mandate of the FWC. The approval process succeeds the completion of bargaining and subsequent drafting of the enterprise agreement. Once the draft has already been generated, it has to be subjected to voting by workers that shall be sheltered under pact. Beforehand voting can be taken for the worker endorsement, employers has to fulfil certain conditions. The employer has to make sure that in the course of the 7 day duration prior to voting for this agreement, a copy of the agreement must be given to the workers along with any other material incorporated in this enterprise agreement. The employer has to further give a notification to the workers of the time as well as place the vote shall be undertaken as well as the method of voting to be employed (Berg et al. 2013). The employers must also make sure that all reasonable moves are taken appropriately to make sure that the enterprise agreement terms along with the effect of such term, are clearly explicated to the workers. The employers must further give inclusive explanation in an appropriate manner including being consumable to young employees, workers from diverse cultural backgrounds as well as workers who never had bargaining representatives (Fernando Chang-Muy and Congress 2015). The employers have to endorse the agreement by voting for the agreement. The vote cannot happen unless at least twenty one days from the time workers were given the notification of their right to filled in a bargaining representative (Kidd et al. 2014). When the vote is successful, the following conditions must be met. For the singe-enterprise agreement the majority of the workers of the employer (s) in case of more than one interest employer that cast valid vote give endorsement to the agreement. In case of multi-enterprise agreement, the majority of workers of at minimum one of employers who have casted valid votes must give endorsement to the agreement (Klarsfeld et al. 2014). Multiple enterprise agreement solely covers proprietors whose workers have voted to approve the agreement. Thus, following the vote, the agreement has to be varied to eliminate such employers whose workers have not participated in voting for the approval of the agreement. No employees are allowed to vote on Greenfield agreement. This kind of agreement has to be signed by every employer and every relevant worker organization which it covers (Bray and Waring 2014). Various steps precede the making and subsequent approval of agreements. The first step in approval is to apply for the FWC approval. The request for a given projected enterprise pact has to be wedged with FWC under fourteen days of arrangement being generated or under such supplementary duration as FWC permits: The following must accompany the application (Pocock Charlesworth and Chapman 2013). The copy of agreement duly signed, besides somewhat declaration which are needed by the FWC to supplement the request. For the endorsement of the enterprise covenant, FWC has to be gratified that: The agreement has sincerely been approved by the workers sheltered by underlying contract The contract has honestly been established by every worker enclosed by arrangement for the circumstance of multi enterprise contract alongside that no individual is compelled, or susceptible to compel, any proprietors to reach agreement The contract complies with BOOT (Better Off Overall Test) The arrangement excludes any illegal expressions (unpredictable with NES or those relating to textile clothing or footwear (TCF) suppliers) The collection of workers enclosed under this pact was chosen justly The arrangement outlines a day as the normal expiration date (within 4 years afterwards day of FWC endorsement) The arrangement gives procedure for a disagreement resolution The arrangement entails a flexibility clause as well as consultation clause Endorsement complies with the good faith haggling Solely employers whose workers have approved agreement are included in case of multi-enterprise agreement TCF outworkers lacks detrimental terms relative to the ones within awards as well as industrial instruments The approval for Greenfield occurs if the organization of employees covered under the agreement have entitlements to represent the respective interest of a majority of the workers and it is the interest of the public. In case of disagreement between employee organizations and employer on terms of Greenfield agreement following 6 months of bargaining, the employer has a room to lodge the agreement for FWCs approval (Westacott 2017). In such circumstances, the FWC has to be satisfied that the agreement complies with BOOT and provides for pay along with condition which comply with standards of pertinent industry (McPhail, Jerrard and Southcombe 2015). The enterprise agreements becomes effective and operationalized within 7 days following the FWCs approval or at a later time as outlined in the agreement. From such a date on, terms and conditions of the workers are drawn from the effective enterprise agreement (Wright and Lansbury 2016). Various strengths and weaknesses are attributable to the process making and subsequent approval of agreements. The strength of the process is that it is straightforward process that with clear terms and conditions that enables employers and employees to reach agreements. The other strength is that the process allows for effective consultation for both parties to understand the content of the agreement. The other strength is that the process allows for the representation of the employers and employees (Bray et al. J 2014). The other strength is that it bestows power on the employees to vote for the approval of the agreement before being presented to the FWC for approval. It also allows fair hearings by allowing all parties the chance to put forward their cases effectively as well as have the same case addressed impartially without favoring either party and in compliance with the law (Baird, McFerran and Wright 2014). It is also based on impartiality anchored on the general rule that a Member cannot deal with an issue in case all conditions, a fair minded viewer could have a sensible apprehension that Member could never bring an unbiased as well as evenhanded mind to the underlying incident before her (Bailey and Peetz 2014). The weakness in the process is that some agreements can be dismissed even if agreed, difficulty in the determination of facts by the FWC and high exposure to bargaining dispute, contravention of bargaining order and failure to reach agreements among parties. References Bailey, J. and Peetz, D., 2014. Australian unions and collective bargaining in 2013. Journal of Industrial Relations, p.0022185614524410. Baird, M., McFerran, L. and Wright, I., 2014. An equality bargaining breakthrough: Paid domestic violence leave. Journal of Industrial Relations, 56(2), pp.190-207. Berg, P., Kossek, E.E., Baird, M. and Block, R.N., 2013. Collective bargaining and public policy: Pathways to work-family policy adoption in Australia and the United States. European Management Journal, 31(5), pp.495-504. Bray, M and Waring, P 2014, Chapter 5: Employment relations, in R Kramar, T Bartram, H De Cieri, RA Noe, JR Hollenbeck, B Gerhart PM Wright, Human resource management in Australia: strategy, people, performance, 5th edn, McGraw-Hill Education (Australia), North Ryde, CQUniversity Course Resources Online (HRMT20027). Bray, M, Waring, P, Cooper, R and Macneil, J 2014, Employment relations: Theory and practice, 3rd edn, McGraw-Hill Education (Australia), North Ryde. Charlesworth, S. and Macdonald, F., 2014. Women, work and industrial relations in Australia in 2013. Journal of Industrial Relations, 56(3), pp.381-396. Fair Work Commission, 2015. Educational Services (Schools) General Staff Award 2010. Fernando Chang-Muy, J.D. and Congress, E.P. eds., 2015. Social work with immigrants and refugees: Legal issues, clinical skills, and advocacy. Springer Publishing Company. Kidd, D.B., Malone, B.P., McBratney, A.B., Minasny, B. and Webb, M.A., 2014. Digital mapping of a soil drainage index for irrigated enterprise suitability in Tasmania, Australia. Soil Research, 52(2), pp.107-119. Klarsfeld, A., Booysen, L.A., Ng, E., Roper, I. and Tatli, A. eds., 2014. 9.78 E+ 12: Country Perspectives on Diversity and Equal Treatment. Edward Elgar Publishing. McPhail, R, Jerrard, M and Southcombe, A 2015, Employment relations: an integrated approach, Cengage Learning Australia, South Melbourne. Pocock, B., Charlesworth, S. and Chapman, J., 2013. Work-family and work-life pressures in Australia: advancing gender equality in good times?. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 33(9/10), pp.594-612. Westacott, J 2017, Enterprise bargaining on the brink, Australian Financial Review, 2 February, p. 34. Wright, C.F. and Lansbury, R.D., 2014. Trade unions and economic reform in Australia, 19832013. The Singapore Economic Review, 59(04), p.1450033. Wright, CF and Lansbury, RD 2016, Employment relations in Australia, in GJ Bamber, RD Lansbury, N Wailes and CF Wright (eds), International and comparative employment relations: National regulation, global changes, 6th edn, eds, Allen Unwin, Crows Nest.

Monday, December 2, 2019

Who do you hold responsible form Mecutios death in Act 3 scene 1 of Romeo and Juliet and why Essay Example For Students

Who do you hold responsible form Mecutios death in Act 3 scene 1 of Romeo and Juliet and why? Essay Who do you hold responsible form Mecutios death in Act 3 scene 1 of Romeo and Juliet and why? How would u show this in performance? There are many characters in Romeo and Juliet that contributed to Mecutios death. Although there are three main suspects, who hold most blame, these are Romeo, Tybalt and Mecutio himself. I personally lay all blame on Romeo, as he aggravated the situation the most up to and during Act 3 scene 1. I would show this in a performance by having Romeos characteristics as being rather sly, having him act as though he is above the group. This will convey to the audience that he doesnt take responsibility for his actions. We will write a custom essay on Who do you hold responsible form Mecutios death in Act 3 scene 1 of Romeo and Juliet and why? specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now Although there are three main suspects, there are also many other characters that contributed to Mecutios death. These characters are, the Capulet and Montague families. There is tension between the two families dog of the house of Montague and though villain Capulet! shows the families are feuding, even their servants fight the quarrel is between our masters, and us their man Friar Laurence holds some blame, as he gave Romeo bad advice about marrying Juliet. Friar Laurence had an ulterior motive when he married Romeo and Juliet turn your households rancour to pure love. Friar Laurence rushes an illegal marriage between Romeo and Juliet holy church incorporate to in one in the hope that their families will stop fighting. Friar Laurences bad advice also results in Romeo meeting the nurse; this frustrates Mecutio as he insults the nurse A bawd hoar and ancient lady which only makes the situation worse. Juliets nurse can be blamed for contributing to Mecutios death as she encourage Romeo an Juliet to marry by getting Juliet to confession leave to go to shrift today although the only has good intentions when it comes to Juliets happiness. The marriage has negative effects, as Romeo cant fight Tybalt as they are now related I have to love thee Juliet herself can be blamed as she proposes to an enemy thy purpose marriage Juliet went against her upbringing and defies her familys wishes. Romeos cousin, Benvolio is a character I would consider to have a major part in Mecutios death. Romeo asked Benvolio to help him break up the fight between Mecutio and Tybalt, Draw Benvolio! Beat down their weapons. Benvolios character is very good at commenting on action but never gets involved, as Benvolio didnt act in this situation, leaving Romeo to stop the fighting, Romeos actions having fatal consequences. Tybalt can be blamed for Mecutios death as he actually stabbed Mecutio, as it says in the stage directions Tybalt wounds Mecutio. Although I dont blame Tybalt as he had no intention of fighting Mecutio. Tybalt went to duel with Romeo. As that was the how honour was satisfied. Tybalt did this because he feels Romeo has lost respect for him the injuries that thou has done me. This is because Romeo, a Montague, snuck into a Capulet party. I will show the audience that Tybalt isnt to blame though facial expressions and body language. When Mecutio threaten Tybalt I would have Mecutio look surprised, put his arms up and step away from Mecutio. This would convey to the audience that Tybalt doesnt have any desire to fight Mecutio. To justify Tybalt fighting Mecutio I will show to the audience that Romeo frustrates Tybalt by not fighting be satisfied and the only reason Tybalt fights Mecutio is because Romeo has made him angry. Mecutio could be blame for his own death. Mecutio is very short tempered an has an aggressive altitude towards life beat down love. These characteristics get Mecutio in trouble. .uedb68f180ab95d5c9b88d4de004e72a8 , .uedb68f180ab95d5c9b88d4de004e72a8 .postImageUrl , .uedb68f180ab95d5c9b88d4de004e72a8 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .uedb68f180ab95d5c9b88d4de004e72a8 , .uedb68f180ab95d5c9b88d4de004e72a8:hover , .uedb68f180ab95d5c9b88d4de004e72a8:visited , .uedb68f180ab95d5c9b88d4de004e72a8:active { border:0!important; } .uedb68f180ab95d5c9b88d4de004e72a8 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .uedb68f180ab95d5c9b88d4de004e72a8 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .uedb68f180ab95d5c9b88d4de004e72a8:active , .uedb68f180ab95d5c9b88d4de004e72a8:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .uedb68f180ab95d5c9b88d4de004e72a8 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .uedb68f180ab95d5c9b88d4de004e72a8 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .uedb68f180ab95d5c9b88d4de004e72a8 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .uedb68f180ab95d5c9b88d4de004e72a8 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .uedb68f180ab95d5c9b88d4de004e72a8:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .uedb68f180ab95d5c9b88d4de004e72a8 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .uedb68f180ab95d5c9b88d4de004e72a8 .uedb68f180ab95d5c9b88d4de004e72a8-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .uedb68f180ab95d5c9b88d4de004e72a8:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Critical Analysis Of Hamlet by William Shakespeare EssayMecutio insults Tybalt you rat-catcher this frustrates Tybalt making the situation worse. Tybalt doesnt provoke Mecutio in anyway but Mecutio draws his sword Heres my fiddle-stick Mecutio is only standing up for his friend, but loses his temper very quickly. Tybalt shows he has no wish to fight Mecutio peace be with you sir. Tybalt shows he has respect for Tybalt by calling him sir. Mecutio intensifies the circumstances surrounding Tybalt and himself. Here comes my man this is an innocent comment made by Tybalt regarding Romeo, yet Mecutio takes Tybalts words out of context. Mecutio becomes enraged, as he is suspicious that his friend Romeo is deserting him. Form Tybalts comment he becomes convinced that Romeo has betrayed him. Romeo doesnt fight Tybalt I have to love thee. Romeos actions irritate Mecutio and he reacts by drawing his sword. Romeo has enraged Mecutio as well and this time he responds to the challenge I am for you. Their actions have fatal consequences. I would have Mecutio show the audience that he tries to support his friend, but when Romeo annoys Mecutio he loses his temper and takes it out on Tybalt. I would show this by Mecutios body language as very defensive forwards Tybalt. When Romeo wont fight Tybalt I would have Mecutios facial expressions as frustrated and angry as he feels his suspicions that Romeo has deserted him are proved to be true. I hold Romeo responsible for Mecutios death as his irresponsible actions leading up to Act 3 Scene 1 caused the most tension and frustration between the people involved. Romeo has an interest in love that isnt felt by Mecutio. Romeo feels he is in love with Rosaline under loves heavy burden Romeo constantly talks about Rosaline this annoys Mecutio be rough with love. Romeo deserts his friends he ran this way the fact that Romeo leaves his friends frustrates Mecutio. Mecutio feels that Romeo has abandoned him to be with Rosaline by Rosalines bright eyes Romeos decision to meet Juliets nurse aggravates Mecutio. Romeo leaves Mecutio when Mecutio is trying to get Romeo to duel with Tybalt by receiving the challenge come to your fathers. Romeo doesnt listen and again leaves Mecutio. When Tybalt comes to challenge Romeo, Romeo has just married Juliet, Tybalts cousin. Romeo has no desire to fight Tybalt and no knowledge of the challenge. Therefore when Tybalt provokes Romeo by saying thou art a villain. Romeos response surprises Tybalt good Capulet, which name I tender as dearly as my own. because Romeo and Tybalt are now related by marriage. Romeos response aggravates Tybalt as Romeo turns to leave. Mecutio and Tybalt are both very frustrated because of Romeos behaviour, and feel honour isnt satisfied. Mecutio provokes Tybalt into a duel pluck you sword Tybalt responds to Mecutios advances. Romeo then makes a grave mistake as the stage directions say Romeo tries to stop the fighting Romeos actions have fatal consequences as Mecutio is wounded under Romeos arm. On stage I would have Romeo at first looking innocent, as he knows nothing about the challenge, then have his body language towards Tybalt as though he was acting superior. This would annoy Tybalt, as he is the elder of the two. When Romeo steps in the way of the fighting I would have the actor playing Romeo use all his force to stop Mecutio from fighting but leave Tybalt free, so he can stab Mecutio. This would show Romeo hasnt thought about his actions properly. Out of the many characters that hold some blame for Mecutios death, I blame Romeo the most. I have conveyed my reasons for this and have also shown how I would display this to the audience if directing a performance of Romeo and Juliet.

Wednesday, November 27, 2019

Alexander Pope essays

Alexander Pope essays Alexander Pope, who lived from 1688-1744, was an English poet who modeled himself after great poets of the classical past. Verse translations, moral and critical essays, satires, and the development of the heroic couplet, made him the leading poet of his age. Pope, born in London, was the son of a cloth merchant. His parents were Roman Catholics, which automatically barred him from England's Protestant universities. Until he was 12 years old, he was educated mainly by priests; afterward, he primarily taught himself. A devastating illness, most likely tuberculosis of the spine, struck him in childhood, leaving him deformed. He never grew taller than 4 ft 6 in and was subject to suffering horrible headaches. Possibly as a result of this condition, he was hypersensitive and exceptionally irritable the rest of his life. He was a very quarrelsome man and attacked his literary contemporaries. To few, he was warm and affectionate; he had a long and close friendship with Irish writer Jonathan Swift. The Essay on Man is a philosophical poem, written in heroic couplets and published between 1732 and 1734. It is an attempt to rationalize the ways of God to Man, and a warning that man himself is not the center of all things. The two main concerns of Pope were, (1) What is, in fact, mans nature and (2) can that nature be justified by observation? (White p.43) The "Essay" consists of four epistles, addressed to Lord Bolingbroke, and were thought to have derived, to some extent, from some of Bolingbroke's writings. The question was often raised regarding the relation between the argument of the Essay on Man and that of certain prose manuscripts of Popes guide Bolingbroke. (MacDonald p.132) Many agreed that the poet and his friend in some way combined their intellect to produce the essay. Pope felt and thought by shocks and electric flashes. He co...

Saturday, November 23, 2019

How To Make Small Talk With Your Boss

How To Make Small Talk With Your Boss Stuck in the elevator or the break room when your boss comes in? Suddenly panic and get tongue-tied? Want desperately impress but not to look in any way desperate? Never fear, you’ll no longer have to spend the rest of the day regretting your awkward small talk drivel. Here are 7 tips on how to talk to your boss without looking stupid or insane.1. Remember their humanity.Your boss is also a person. I know that can be hard to keep in mind, but it’s important to remember. Don’t overanalyze and read things into every single thing she says. Keep in mind she might be tired or having a bad day, or just preoccupied, and doesn’t mean anything by what she says. Bosses get to be introverted or awkward too!2. Read the signs.Body language is your friend here. Take note of your boss’s stance and gestures, then compare those to when he talks to other colleagues or co-workers. That furrowed brow might just be the way his face looks- not a sign he’s mad at y ou! If he looks really busy and closed off, leave the conversation to a minimum and try to charm him on another day.3. Know your answer.Guaranteed the first question you’ll be asked is â€Å"How are you?† or â€Å"How’s it going?† Don’t be caught out by this obvious first conversational parry. Have an answer ready that won’t trap you in the â€Å"Good. And you?† â€Å"Good† dead end. Pivot to a conversation about something you’re both working on, or some piece of company or industry news. Try to keep the conversation 80/20 about cool interesting work-related things, vs. personal matters- yours or hers.4. Trader Joe it.Ever been in a Trader Joe’s? Those employees are pathologically pleasant and instantly put customers at ease. Be easygoing and forthcoming. Throw in a few details and a charming smile and you might just make a lastingly positive impression.5. Talk about them.Accomplished people love nothing more than to talk about themselves. Give your boss a bit of leeway to do just that. Compliment a recent project or accomplishment of theirs, then sit back and let them direct the conversation.6. Talk travel.Particularly if your boss just got back from traveling or from vacation, you can always just ask how their trip went and then sit back and hear all the jealous-making details. Bonus points if you have some nice trivia or intel about the place they’ve just come from or are going next.7. Problem solve.If there’s a particularly stick or baffling bit of an upcoming project you’re working on, it can be a great idea to get your boss involved. Make her a part of the excitement of problem solving. Two heads are always better than one! Plus it gets your boss looking at how devoted and intent you are on doing excellent work for her and for the company. Bonus!

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Yours Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Yours - Essay Example One must know that there are some people holding opinion that handling the most dangerous creature on the planet, i.e., beautiful women is an art in itself and this is an issue which really comes across during the time of the first date. A man tries his best to have the best possible clothes on his body as well as carry a decent hair do, one which will surely be liked by his date, or the first date if we may say. I believe women are very sensitive when the talk is of choosing their date partners. Even the slightest of details are seen with a vigilant eye (by the girl). Thus I believe an American man is constantly under pressure to show own self in his best possible dressing as well as exhibit his manners to the extreme. I hold very diverse ways about this subject and quite rightly so. I opine that some American men love to save the mementos that they receive from their dates and openly show them to their friends, one and all, thus bringing into notice the achievements they have had. It is a totally different story if there is no memento for the person; hence nothing to actually share or brag about within friends and relatives on the man’s part who had his first date. For many American males like me, their first dates turn out to be real horrendous, thus bringing with them pain, frustration and shattered dreams, which they had built of their ideal girl during their leisure time. Everyone like me does so and it surely is agony for us poor souls who see their dates either being fat, chubby or somewhat physically impaired. There might be some other physical and mental disabilities, notwithstanding while preferences on the man’s part are endless too. However I think that dating can be sometimes degrading depending upon the girl with whom the date is being set with as well as the unexpected and uncontrollable surroundings and

Wednesday, November 20, 2019

In Favor of the Protect Life Act Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

In Favor of the Protect Life Act - Research Paper Example The litmus test for any efficient law is that it creates a favorable and just society, while leading to a minimal wastage of the tax payers’ money. After seriously deliberating and pondering on the varied aspects of law, American values and the available statistics, I have decided to emphatically support the Protect Life Act. I strongly and reasonably believe that the American tax payers’ money should not be wasted on facilitating, funding and allowing abortions. It is not only contrary the time tested Western ethics, but also does not make a sound economic sense. Many people are perhaps simply not aware of the fact that abortion currently qualifies to be labeled a gargantuan problem for our society that is undermining its values and economy. Every year, 42 million abortions take place in the United States of America. This roughly amounts to a horrendous 115,000 abortions per day. Things will get clearer if one takes into consideration as to whom the people are having t hese abortions. 52 percent of the women resorting to abortions happen to be less than 25 years of age. (The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform: Online)). Moreover, of these, 20 percent happen to be teenagers (The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform: Online). Also, out of all the abortions conducted every year, only 1 percent are performed on women who are victims of incest or rape, and a mere 6 percent of these abortions are performed for reasons classified as potential health risks to the mother or the child (The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform: Online). Astonishingly, 93 percent of the abortions are carried on for social or personal reasons ((The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform: Online). The American society and the American tax payer certainly have ample responsibilities towards people facing health risks and those who are the victims of crime and abuse. But, going by the mentioned statistics, why should the American public be wasting its hard earned money on supporting the abortions of people who simply get carried away by the recreational aspects of their love life, without giving a serious thought to the possible outcomes of their irresponsible attitude. I am no way against unmarried people engaging in sex, and am all in favor of sex education. Yet, I also hold that as people are responsible for the consequences of their career decisions, financial decisions, they are also as much responsible for the outcomes of their coital decisions and choices. Hence, it is they who should be bearing the cost of their irresponsible acts and not the American tax payer. The other thing that needs to be taken into consideration is that is abortion simply a problem or also a symptom of a bigger problem existing in our economic system? Again, it would be realistic and pragmatic to resort to the available and credible statistics. Almost, 29 percent of the abortions are availed by women whose family income stands to be less than $ 15,000 (The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform: Online). 19.5 pe rcent of the abortions are performed on women whose family income is between $ 15,000 and $ 29,999 (The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform: Online). In the case of women whose family income is more than $ 60,000, a mere 13.8 percent of the ab

Sunday, November 17, 2019

Love Essay Example for Free

Love Essay When I think about the concept of love, my thoughts are uncertain. When I think about the word love, the four letters arranged in a random pattern, nothing is simpler. Clearly, a distinct difference lies between a word and what it represents. The importance of the word love lies in the power it has over people. When asking someone what love means, not one person has a solid answer to the question. The word love is so abstract, as to which why I adore the word â€Å"Love. † While growing older, we have used the word love in many contexts. The word love can be referred to as a variety of different feelings and attitudes, ranging from just common pleasure I loved that meal to an intense interpersonal attraction I love my boyfriend. The word love can be used in numerous ways and with endless feeling. In certain situations, the word love is such an expression that sometimes ones relationship might even depend on it. For example, If for a long time someone has not said â€Å"I love you† to a loved one, they might think something is wrong. The word â€Å"love† is a word that makes one wonder how much power one word could have. Love does not have just one meaning, but rather many different definitions. It is a word used in many different contexts, with many different levels of feelings that are unexplainable. Love is a word that is universal in every language of the world. Everyone knows of it or has used the word. Although we know of it, no person has an actual definition of it. The uncertainty of this word makes me realize how powerful the word is, even though we still seem to know what someone is trying to say. Everyone uses the word love, but never took a minute to think about its meaning. I adore this word and will always think about as the future generations use the word love in ambiguity.